Execution One

March 28, 2016

PR Ethics


Ethics in advertising and public relations is hotly debated among professionals and for good reason. With changing technology and advancements to everyday life the consumer is essentially laid out among a buffet of everything an advertiser/PR professional needs to understand before marketing their product. No matter when the times though honesty has always proven difficult in PR. In my opinion remaining honest, whether for good or bad is necessary to keep your organization out of hot water. Manipulating the truth can help to further your company’s agenda and none will be the wiser, which is why I believe PR professionals will not become increasingly ethical but instead display a guise of ethics.
In the article “We are Professional Manipulators” – PR Pros, are we lying to ourselves? Published by PRWeek follows a report gathered at the 23rd International Public Relations Research Symposium, BledCom, in Slovenia. This report yielded results of more than 20 interviews in which 17 of the interviewees admitted to lying to the media on a regular basis. A not so surprising yet still disappointing truth found in the public relations field. However, this is where ethic can begin to be challenged, one PR professional stated "Of course I lie ­– I lie because my CEO expects it, I have to lie to cover my CEO's [butt]. If I don't lie and make it all look better, he and a lot of others will suffer. So I lie. A lot." I believe this is a direct reflection of asymmetrical communication gone wrong…or possibly right? It is a grey area. Asymmetrical communication’s intended purpose is to persuade the audience and do this through one-sided conversation. Lying to media and the consumer achieves asymmetrical conversation without interfering with laws because PR is guided more so through a code of ethics.
In the article 7 PR lies to avoid at all costs by Dorothy Crenshaw, deceptive stunts, astroturfing and social hijacking are a few of the examples cited. News hijacking is used frequently by PR people and follows an important event. The problem with social hijacking is that it is not considered a lie but instead a manipulation on what feels like a very personal level for the consumer. Social hijacking can take place on Twitter or Facebook accounts and posts and often pushes the consumer to feel a certain way they may not have before but believe they came to on their own. PR examples of this could be Starbuck’s #RaceTogether. Showing up later on their Twitter account but first originating on Starbucks cups. Barista’s were encouraged to write this message on cups being served. Missing the mark and questioning what kind of response Starbucks would receiving from their customers. Manipulating a consumer’s perspective both online and within their actual product does not allow for the consumer to come to their own decisions or understand the product properly.
I believe that PR is fighting to be portrayed as ethical when many professionals are increasingly losing their ethics, honesty and loyalty to the consumer.
           


Sources:

No comments:

Post a Comment